Chapter Nine

INNER VISIONS AND RUNNING TRAINS

Faqir Chand Meets the Tibetan Book of the Dead

 

One of the most remarkable aspects about the Tibetan Book of

the Dead (or, more accurately speaking, The Bardo Tho-

trol)[1] is the principle that whatever one perceives during

the dying process is ultimately illusory.

Experiences of seeing inner light, hearing wondrous melodies, and feeling

sensations of being out of the body, according to The Bardo

Thotrol, are but momentary reflections of one's own psycho-

logical condition. As such, they are not to be valued in and

of themselves, since they cannot by their nature reveal the

ultimate truth, but only--even if magnificently--obscure it.

The reason for this is simple, if profound: whatever

one sees in the dying process is a projection from one's own

self. Since this self/soul/ego in Buddhism is the root cause

of man's suffering, and not a real and permanent condition,

anything which reinforces, glamorizes, or even elevates its

status is misleading and generative of delusion. The key to

enlightenment in Mahayana Buddhism, unlike Christianity, is

not salvation of the soul, but rather its annihilation as a

continued sensation. Therefore, The Tibetan Book of the

Dead is a practical text on how to carry out the process of

death to its terminal apex: extermination of the individual

self. At first glance this may seem a bit extreme, espe-

cially to those steeped in Western religions which place a

higher value on personal immortality, but in light of

Buddha's teachings it is perfectly consistent with his phi-

losophy which views death--real death--in a very positive

light.

What is perhaps most intriguing about the Tibetan Book

of the Dead, at least from a scientific perspective, is its

thoroughly rational and skeptical character. Although the

text does instruct the neophyte to accept the clear void

light as one's own, it does not describe in precise terms

what that light is. Instead, it concentrates on what the

light is not. It is not anything which can be seen, heard,

touched or felt--even on a higher or more elevated plane of

awareness. It is, on the contrary, the suchness or context

or spectrum out of which all things operate, but in and of

itself cannot be grasped as any particular thing. Thus it is

always identified through negation (neti, neti; "not this,

not that") or through negative images: emptiness, void,

vacuity, etc. It is, if we can describe it at all, no-

thing.

The implications for the dying lama are clear: do not

accept whatever may arise in the intermediate stage just

after death, for each apparition betrays its real origin,

imputing a sense of reality and permanence upon something

which has neither. Realize, rather, that nirvana is the

source from which all visions arise and is therefore itself

not a vision. Or, put in more philosophical terms, truth is

the condition from which all conditions arise--itself not

being a secondary effect.

Surprisingly, one of the more lucid insights on the

philosophy of the Tibetan Book of the Dead comes from a

Hindu mystic, named Baba Faqir Chand, who apparently was not

familiar with the original Tibetan text or its English

translation. Although Faqir was not conversant with the

Bardo Thotrol, he was nevertheless steeped in its philosophy

as taught to him by his guru, Shiv Brat Lal of Gopiganj.

Faqir Chand, like his lama counterparts, spent much of his

life in meditation, attempting to consciously go through the

dying process in order to prepare himself for his final

exit. However, unlike others of his kind, Faqir left a

detailed account of his some seventy plus years of medita-

tion (ranging from 3 to 12 hours daily) which led up to his

enlightenment. The result is a richly detailed account

which provides a thorough understanding of how inner visions

and the like are projected in the intermediate stages

between life and death.

As the Bardo Thodol [sic] text makes very clear by

repeated assertions, none of all these deities or spir-

itual beings has any real individual existence any more

than have human beings. "It is quite sufficient for

thee (i.e., the deceased percipient) to know that these

apparitions are (the reflections of) thine own

thought-forms." They are merely the consciousness-

content visualized, by karmic agency, as apparitional

appearances in the Intermediate state--airy nothings

woven into dreams.

--Tibetan Book of the Dead[2]

Now, you see no Jesus Christ comes from without in

anybody's visions. No Rama, no Krishna, no Buddha, and

no Baba Faqir comes from without to anybody. The

visions are only because of the impressions and sugges-

tions that a disciple has already accepted in his mind.

These impressions and suggestions appear to him like a

dream. No body comes from without. This is the plain

truth.

--Baba Faqir Chand[3]

What strikes the reader almost immediately after read-

ing both the Bardo Thotrol and The Unknowing Sage is the

remarkable similarity between both texts. Whereas the Bardo

Thotrol is written mostly in second person and third person,

listing instructions for the departing soul, The Unknowing

Sage is in first person, presenting the reader with Faqir

Chand's frank autobiographical admissions about his medita-

tive life. Yet, in both texts the respective philosophies

coincide: 1) the illusory nature of religious visions; 2)

the limitations of knowledge, both rational and

transmundane; and 3) the principle that the ego/self/soul is

the real cause of man's unenlightened state.

How Faqir Chand came to this realization is an

interesting story in itself, especially for someone steeped

in the Radhasoami tradition. From a very early age, Faqir

was prone towards mystical experiences, oftentimes seeing

religious visions of Krishna and Rama, who would, we are

told, instruct Faqir on various aspects of his religious

life. Eventually, however, Faqir became so distraught in

his quest for God-Realization that he became hysterical and

stopped eating. As Faqir recollects:

Once I wept for twenty-four hours continuously for a

glimpse of the Lord. Doctors were called in. They

administered medicine to me. At about five o'clock in

the morning I saw in a vision the form of Maharishi

Shiv Brat Lal [Faqir's eventual guru]. He drew water

from a nearby well and helped me take a bath, and then

told me his address in Lahore. This experience con-

vinced me that God had incarnated Himself in the form

of Maharishi Shiv Brat Lal.[4]

Faqir's experience convinced him that Shiv Brat Lal was

an incarnation of the Lord. After ten months of correspon-

dence, Faqir received initiation from his preceptor into the

Radhasoami faith in 1905.[5] It was not until the end of

World War One, though, that Faqir received his first glimpse

of enlightenment. For prior to this time (1919), Faqir

accepted whatever inner sights and sounds he beheld in medi-

tation as true and objective. The turning point came after a

battle in Hamidia in Iraq. Working as an inspector for the

railway station, Faqir and his group came under heavy enemy

attack. Fearing for his life, Faqir prayed internally for

help from his guru, Shiv Brat Lal. Almost miraculously,

Shiv Brat Lal appeared to Faqir in his inner vision. As

Faqir recalls:

I too was shaken with the fear of death. In this very

moment of fear, the Holy Form of Hazur Data Dayal Ji

appeared before me and said, "Faqir, worry not, the

enemy has not come to attack but to take away their

dead. Let them do that. Don't waste your ammunition."

I sent for the Subedar Major and told him about the

appearance of my Guru and his directions concerning the

enemy. The Subedar Major followed the directions of my

Guru. The rebel Jawans came and carried away their

dead without attacking our positions. By six o'clock

in the morning, our airplanes came and they dropped the

necessary supplies. Our fears vanished. We gained

courage. We were safe.[6]

Though Faqir was overjoyed by this miracle, he did not

appreciate its full import until some three months later

when he realized that it was a projection of his own mind.

When Faqir asked Shiv Brat Lal about his appearance, the

guru said that he knew nothing whatsoever about it. More-

over, around the time Faqir saw the miraculous form of his

guru, Faqir's friends were also in danger and prayed to God.

But instead of Shiv Brat Lal appearing to them, Faqir

Chand's radiant form manifested and saved their lives. When

Faqir was informed about this incident he was "wonder

struck":

After about three months, the fighting came to an end

and the Jawans retired to their barracks. I returned

to Bagdad, where there were many satsangis. When they

learned of my arrival, they all came together to see

me. It was all very unexpected and a surprising scene

for me. I asked them, "Our Guru Maharaj is at Lahore.

I am not your Guru. Why do you worship me?" They

replied in unison, "On the battle field we were in

danger. Death lurked over our heads. You appeared

before us in those moments of danger and gave us direc-

tion for our safety. We followed your instructions and

thus were saved." I was wonder struck by this surpris-

ing explanation of theirs. I had no knowledge of their

trouble. I, myself, being in danger those days of com-

bat, had not even remembered them.[7]

 

Thus, it was through a series of remarkable events that

Faqir began to question the authenticity of his inner

visions. Instead of accepting whatever appeared to him dur-

ing his voyages out of the body Faqir doubted them and

attempted to find the source from which all such visions

arise. Faqir's adventures began to dovetail at this point

with the underlying philosophy of the Bardo Thotrol: "That

all phenomena are transitory, are illusionary, are unreal,

and non-existent save in the sangsaric mind perceiving them.

. . That in reality there are no such beings anywhere as

gods, or demons, or spirits, or sentient creatures--all

alike being phenomena dependent upon a cause. . . That this

cause is a yearning or a thirsting after sensation, after

the unstable sangsaric existence."[8]

Eventually, Faqir dismissed his visionary encounters as

nothing but subtle obstructions of maya. It was at this

point that Faqir's meditation took a new turn: instead of

enjoying the bliss of inner sights and sounds, Faqir turned

his attention to the source from which these manifestations

arose. And in so doing, Faqir no longer became attracted to

visions of Krishna, Rama, or even his guru, Shiv Brat Lal.

Comments Faqir:

O'Dayal's mother, whom you see within and whom you love

within is your own creation, your own child. You,

yourself, create the image of Shiv Brat Lal in your

center of Trikuti, while other devotees create ideals

such as Krishna, Rama, or other Gods at the same center

and enjoy their vision. Man is basically ignorant

about the reality. Mother Bhagyawati is not a lonely

example. I too suffered many hardships due to his very

ignorance.[9]

Faqir's insights, interestingly, tally with Book One of

the Tibetan Book of the Dead. As Evans-Wentz comments:

These Deities [manifestations of various gods and god-

dess in the intermediate plane] are in ourselves. They

are not something apart from us. . . In this esoteric

sense, the Lotus Order of Deities represent the deified

principles of the vocal functions of ourselves. . .

.[10]

In this new chapter in Faqir's spiritual quest, he

began to develop a dispassion for anything which arose in

his meditation--be it delightful or wrathful. Instead Faqir

began to query, "Who is it that sees the light? Who is it

that hears the sound?" In other words, what is it that

experiences this world and worlds beyond it? No doubt,

Faqir reasoned, it is consciousness. But what is that? won-

dered Faqir. The answer would haunt Faqir for the rest of

his life, for he realized that no matter what spiritual

practices he may do he would never know. It was simply

incomprehensible, a mystery without limitation. To Faqir the

haunting aspect about this discovery was that no human being

(not even avatars, saints, or gurus), he surmised, could

possibly know. Indeed, it was this very unknowability which

constituted man's enlightenment, or so Faqir intuited.

Argues Faqir:

I do not proclaim that whatever I say is correct or

final. Whatever I say is the conclusion of my experi-

ence of life. Nature is unfathomable. No one has known

it. A small germ in a body cannot know the whole body.

Similarly (a) human being is like a small germ in a

vast Creation. How can he claim to have known the

entire creation? Those who say that they have known

are wrong. No one can describe or even know the entire

creation. Up to a certain extent to which man's mind

has access, one can say something. But nobody can tell

about the entire universe. It is indescribable.

Paradoxically buoyed by this intuition, Faqir began to

immerse himself more and more into the clear void light,

forgetting himself and his quest in the process. Although

Faqir's extraordinary excursions took place while he was

still alive, and not in a near-death state, his experiences

reinforce the general philosophy of the Bardo Thotrol about

liberation.

O Son of noble family, (name), listen. Now the pure

luminosity of the dharmata is shining before you;

recognize it. O son of noble family, at this moment

your state of mind is by nature pure emptiness, it does

not possess any nature whatever, neither substance or

quality such as colour, but it is pure emptiness; this

is the dharmata. . . This mind of yours is inseparable

luminosity and emptiness in the form of a great mass of

light, it has no birth or death, therefore it is the

Buddha of Immortal Light. To recognize this is all that

is necessary.[11]

What exactly this emptiness or luminosity is cannot, by

definition, be described. In the Tibetan Book of the Dead

the emphasis is on recognizing one's true nature, that which

is no-thing in particular but rather the field in which all

things arise--itself being visionless, though producing

visions; itself being structureless, though exhibiting

structure; itself being non-existent, though producing

existence. The clear void light is absolutely paradoxical,

since the "I" cannot grasp it, nor can the mind by its

subject/object dualism conceive it. Ken Wilber, a well

regarded transpersonal theorist and practicing Zen Buddhist,

describes it this way:

The Absolute is both the highest state of being and the

ground of being; it both the goal of evolution and the

ground of evolution, the highest stage of development

and the reality or suchness of all stages of develop-

ment; the highest of all conditions and the Condition

of all conditions; the highest rung in the ladder and

the wood out of which the ladder is made. Anything

less than that paradox generates either pantheistic

reductionism, on the one hand, or wild and radical

transcendentalism on the other. . . .[12]

Thus Faqir, following his Tibetan counterparts,

eschewed even the pure light and sound which was beyond

form, and attached himself to no-thing, allowing himself, as

he so astutely put it, to "hang on the gallows." But in so

doing, Faqir broke with Radhasoami tradition, which advo-

cates surat shabd yoga (lit., "uniting the soul with the

divine inner sound"), and eventually became regarded as a

"heretic."[13] Near the end of his life, Faqir grew closer

to the philosophical principles of Buddhism, particularly

Mahayana, as outlined in the Bardo Thotrol. Indeed, if one

were only to look at his later writings, one would come away

with the impression that Faqir came from a lineage of

Tibetan lamas. The following passage is particularly

relevant in this regard:

O' Faqir these satsangis have taught you the method of

hanging at the gallows. Only this experience of the

manifestation of my form at different places, of which

I am never aware, has changed my life. . . My experi-

ences prove that Yogi, Meditator, Guru, Disciple and

even the aspirant of salvation are in bondage. . .

These people who create my form with their mental

forces to fulfill their worldly desires are not

interested to know the Truth. They do not hang them-

selves on the gallows, because they depend on the sup-

port of my Form. Whereas to a man on the gallows there

is no support. This is the highest stage.[14]

It is precisely this letting go--both of the objects

which entice the mind and the mind itself--which constitutes

the final meditation in the Tibetan Book of the Dead. When

this is done, no rebirth is possible, since there is no one

left to reap experiences. But what happens to those who can-

not let go into the clear void light? What is their plight?

According to the Bardo Thotrol, such beings have a series of

lesser options, whereby they can take new births in higher

or lower dimensions of awareness. Regions upon regions

exist where departed beings are enjoying the fruits of their

karmic actions. Their fall, so to say, from the empty lumi-

nosity is due to one simple, but devastating mistake: they

took the apparitions, the lights, the colors, the sounds,

and the sensations of the intermediate plane to be real, and

not as projections of their own self-created karma. In a

phrase, they bought the dream as reality and were thus

duped. Concerning these beings, the Tibetan Book of the

Dead says:

O son of noble family, if you do not recognize them

[the various lights and apparitions] as your projec-

tions, whatever meditation practice you have done dur-

ing your life, you have not met with this teaching, the

coloured light will frighten you, the sounds will

bewilder you and the rays of light will terrify you.

If you do not understand this essential point of the

teachings you will not the recognize the sounds, lights

and rays, and so you will wander in samsara.[15]

Faqir Chand also reiterates the teachings of the Bardo

Thotrol on this issue of karmic propensities (the principle

that karma sways one away from the clear void light at

death, if one is not attached beforehand in the empty lumi-

nosity). Faqir's frank autobiographical admissions reveal

that even a sage as steeped in meditation as he could occa-

sionally fall from the truth and get caught in the whirlpool

of attachment. For instance, when Faqir Chand went to sleep

he usually attached himself to the light and sound within,

but occasionally would get caught up with dreams, falsely

believing that he was seeing his father, his son, his wife,

trains, and so on. As Faqir points out:

This night I had a dream in which I saw running trains.

An accident occurred; I carried my luggage; my father

(whom I was afraid of) met me ahead. Then I met my

mother; my first wife was also sitting there. I

inquired from my wife, "What about your wounded leg? Is

your leg now alright? Are you not my wife?" Meanwhile

I awoke and attuned my Self to the Shabd (Inner Sound

Current). . . All these deeds, thoughts and feelings

where selfish motives are involved shall positively

have their reaction upon the individual concerned,

either in the waking state or in sleep. Why do I say

so? This is my experience. Ever since the establish-

ment of Manavta Mandir I have never dreamed about it.

Why? Because my Self is neither attached to Mandir nor

to any of you. But why do my father, mother, wife and

railway trains appear time and again in my dreams?

Because my Self was attached to them.[16]

Faqir's observation of what occurs in the dream state

also holds true for what happens in the intermediate plane

after death, since both involve the same fundamental rule:

attachment creates repetition and thus the cycle of samsara

continues. Liberation, both in the Tibetan Book of the Dead

and in The Unknowing Sage, is non-attachment to anything or

anyone. Only then can the bubble or knot of self-existence

be undone.

When Faqir Chand was asked what would happen to him

after death, he frankly remarked, "I don't know." When

asked to elaborate, he proceeded to give a gist of his

entire philosophy of life; not surprisingly, as I have

attempted to point out in this paper, Faqir's outlook echoes

almost point by point The Tibetan Book of the Dead:

So what I have understood about Nam is that it is the

true knowledge of the feelings, visions, and images

that are seen within. This knowledge is that all the

creations of the waking, dreaming and deep sleep modes

of consciousness are nothing but samskaras (impressions

which are in truth unreal) that are produced by the

mind. What to speak about others, even I am not aware

of my own Self (in dreams). Who knows what may happen

to me at the time of death? I may enter the state of

unconsciousness, enter the state of dreams and see

railway trains. . . How can I make a claim about my

attainment of the Ultimate? The truth is that I know

nothing.[17]

Evans-Wentz, writing some forty years earlier than

Faqir, makes the following observation concerning the Bardo

Thotrol:

It is not necessary to suppose that all the dead in the

Intermediate State experience the same phenomena, any

more than all the living do in the human world, or in

dreams. . . As a man is taught, so he believes. . .

.[18]

In the end, Faqir's death was an untypical one. In

April of 1981 he installed his spiritual successor, Dr. I.C.

Sharma, at Manavta Mandir, Hoshiarpur, and then proceeded to

fly to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in the United States to

conduct his fifth world tour. He was ninety-five years old.

But just prior to departing from the Delhi airport, Faqir

was asked in a tape-recorded meeting by a long-time friend

and devotee when he would be coming back. Faqir, in an

unusually prophetic reply, responded: "When I come back, it

will be in black box." And so it was. Several weeks later in

a Pittsburgh hospital Faqir after undergoing a cardiac

arrest and suffering in a coma for several days died.[19]

Days later his body was sent back to India in a casket for

final cremation rights.

One can only wonder if the unknowing sage melted into

the empty luminosity or into the dream world of running

trains.

---

 

[1] I will be using two translations here for my ar-

ticle: Evans-Wentz's famous work, The Tibetan Book of

the Dead (New York: Causeway Books, 1973); and Frances-

ca Mantle's and Chogyam Trungpa's The Tibetan Book of

the Dead (Berkeley: Shambhala, 1975).

[2] Op. cit., pages 32-33.

[3] Op. cit., page 4

[4] Op. cit., page 22.

[5] For more on the Radhasoami tradition, see Radha

Swami Teachings by Lekh Raj Puri (Beas: Radha Soami

Foundation, 1967).

[6] Op. cit., page 26. Also see Lane's "The Himalayan

Connection" (Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Fall

1984) for more on the psychological implications of

Faqir's visionary experiences.

[7] Op. cit., page 26. It should be pointed out that

just prior to leaving to Iraq, Shiv Brat Lal informed

Faqir that the ultimate guru was within one's self, no-

where on the outside. In fact, during this meeting,

Shiv Brat Lal appointed Faqir as his spiritual succes-

sor, blessing his disciple with the following words:

"Faqir, you are yourself the Supreme Master of your

time. Start delivering spiritual discourses to the

seekers and initiate them into the path of Sant Mat. In

due course of time, your own satsangis [followers] will

prove to be your "True Guru," and it is through your

experiences with them that the desired secret of Sant

Mat will be revealed to you." [Op. cit., page 25.]

[8] Evans-Wentz, op. cit., page 66

[9] Op. cit., page 48.

nd healthy mind. But, as Lane

points out in his recent study The Politics of Guru

Successorship, gurus have a vested interest in preserv-

ing their territory; Faqir Chand, regardless of age,

was obviously a a threat to orthodox Radhasoami doc-

trines.

[14] Op. cit., page 50.

[15] Freemantle el al, op. cit., page 41.

[16] Op. cit., page 45.

[17] Op. cit., page 47.

[18] Evans-Wentz, op. cit., page 33.

[19] For more on Faqir's death, please refer to I.C.

Sharma's Hindi biography of Faqir Chand entitled Sidha

Satpurusha Faqir Baba.

 

 ..
Porte d'accesso al Mondo Reale: